The Debate About Consumer Society
4/27/09
I. The Value of Consumption and Fashion
A. Negative attitudes toward fashion and consumption, revisited1. Fashion is selfishB. These ideas are wrong, or, when they are right, they make fashion and consumption even more important to understand
2. Fashion is superficial, appearances can be deceiving
3. Fashion and shopping are vulgar, robotic parts of mass culture, manipulated by capitalism and advertising
4. Shopping and consumption are female, not real work
5. Shopping is fun
6. Shopping and consumption are forms of cultural imperialism
C. Economic importance1. Average American today consumes twice as much as in 1950 (Twitchell)
2. Other countries want to and are increasing consumption
II. The Opposing View: Downshifting and Voluntary Simplicity
A. Juliet Schor's critique1. 1990s, 75-80% of the American public felt that we were too materialisticB. Diderot effect: (18th century, Denis Diderot)
2. Kids being killed for jackets, demanding $100 sneakers
3. Community activities replaced by mall visits
4. Environment can't sustain consumption levels, global warming
5. Labor conditions, return of sweatshops
6. Too much work, too little time for family, friends, or community1. Consumption demands more consumption in pursuit of the newC. Downshifting: working less, spending less
2. Cycle of work and spend, constant dissatisfaction1. Spend time on cooking, gardening, volunteerism, activities with familyD. Voluntary simplicity: careful budgeting in order to become financially independent
2. Happier, more satisfied with life
E. Downshifting and voluntary simplicity involve economic changes and attitude adjustments
F. Economists worry: decline in productivity, recession
G. Schor's response1. Reduction in spending is gradual, economy can adjustH. Effects of fashion and consumption are ambivalent ==> make informed, conscious choices, confront ambiguity and contradiction
2. Reduction in spending includes reduction in work ==> no increase in unemployment
3. Employment structure could change, i.e. four-day weeks
4. Lower productivity can be combated through increased education, research, and development
|
|
For more information, contact: aleshkow@holycross.edu