From Production to Consumption in Anthropology
1/16/09
I. Structure of Course
II. Consumption as the "Vanguard of History" (Daniel Miller)
A. Consumption drives global economy
B. Miller: "Consumption... is the one arena where most of us still feel we have some power left to influence what we might become" (20)
C. Two questions1. Why is consumption so important?
2. What took anthropologists so long to recognize this?
III. Production and Exchange in the Development of Anthropology
A. Origins of social science (Marx, Durkheim, Weber)1. Changes in 19th century Europe: industrialization, urbanizationB. 1920s: Anthropologists like Mauss, Malinowski focus on exchange
2. Human evolution as march of technological progress
3. Changing modes of production propel system1. Commodities, money = impersonal
2. Gifts, barter = reciprocity, mutual obligation, social relationships
IV. Consumption as a Form of Imperialism
A. Consumption seen as destroying indigenous culturesa. Trinidadians drinking Coca-Cola or Malaysian teenagers wearing Levi'sB. Anti-American nationalist and socialist movements
b. Symbolic violence, neo-imperialism, Westernization
V. Shifts in the Organization of Late Capitalism Promote Consumption
A. Consumption rises with income, stimulates production
Per Capita Income and Personal Consumption Expenditures
(in 2000 dollars)
Year Gross
national
productPersonal
incomeDisposable
personal
incomePersonal consumption expenditures Durable
goodsNondurable
goodsServices Total 1950 $1,950 $1,516 $1,388 $203 $648 $420 $1,270 1960 2,935 2,283 2,026 240 846 753 1,838 1970 51,010 4,101 3,591 414 1,326 1,424 3,164 1980 12,431 10,205 8,869 940 3,057 3,744 7,741 1990 23,331 19,614 17,176 1,871 4,985 8,472 15,327 1998 32,444 27,447 23,491 2,562 6,315 12,767 21,644 1999 33,927 28,489 24,242 2,787 6,708 13,399 22,895 2000 35,802 30,205 25,528 2,976 7,224 14,230 24,429 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, July 2001.Web: www.bea.gov.
B. Vertical integration1. Producers are distributorsC. Shifts in consumption in developing countries
2. Gap, Ann Taylor, supermarket brands: flexible, efficient, fast in responding to consumer demands1. Attractive markets
2. sneakers
VI. The Collapse of Communism
A. Slavenka Drakulik: communism failed to produce basic necessities like sanitary napkins
B. Capitalism meets consumer needs, makes products accessible
VII. Critiques Linking Consumption with Production
A. Industrial revolution, globalizaton have increased quantity of goods, lowered prices
B. American consumption of clothing1. 1998: 17.2 billion articles of clothing purchased, 16% increase over 1993C. American consumption depends on exploitation of producers
2. Clothing prices dropped 10% from 1999-2008, increase for all consumer goods was 22% (source: http://www.bls.gov/data/home.htm)1. Low wages, long hours, poor conditions abroad
2. Domestic "outsourcing"
VIII. Consumption, Pleasure, and Cultural Distinctiveness
A. Self-expression, pleasure
B. Miller: Coca-cola in Trinidad
C. Consumption of mass-produced goods can promote heterogeneity
|
|
For more information, contact: aleshkow@holycross.edu