Holy Cross Home Skip the Navigation
Search | Site Index | Directions | Web Services | Calendar
 About HC    |   Admissions   |   Academics   |   Administration   |   Alumni & Friends   |   Athletics   |   Library
Holy Cross Magazine
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Book Notes
  Class Notes
  In Memoriam
  Road Signs
   
  Search the Magazine
  All Issues
  About the Magazine
   
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Features
     
   

The Troubleshooters

Due to “Prior Proper Planning,” the College’s Y2K Team is looking forward to a quiet New Year’s Day. 

By Margaret LeRoux 

Dick McFadden, Lisa Nestor, Heikki Paadre, Bob WillisPredictions of catastrophes at the approach of the millennium may be popular with doomsday proponents, but on the campus of Holy Cross there is scarcely a furrowed brow among members of the Resolution 2000 Working Group.

Although charged with the awesome responsibility of “taking all reasonable steps to assure that everything functions normally when the millennium clock turns,” the six members of the team, who have been meeting monthly for the past two years, exude quiet confidence. With five months to go before the turn of the century, they have already solved many potential Y2K problems by applying patches and rewriting lines of code. They have inventoried all the College’s computers, software and applications; testing of major components to verify that they are Y2K compliant is almost completed.

The Resolution 2000 Working Group, headed by Heikki Paadre, information technology services assistant director for production and network operations, represents a cross section of the College. Members of the group include: Joan Champagne, purchasing manager; Dick McFadden, assistant director for operations, physical plant; Lisa Nestor, senior lab supervisor, chemistry department; Ken Scott, academic support specialist, information technology services; and Bob Willis, manager, dining services business systems.
“During our meetings we’ve been doing a lot of troubleshooting,” explains Nestor. “Recently we’ve added contingency planning.”

“We know what we would have to do in the first 24, 48 and 72 hours if a crisis occurs,” Paadre says.
Even though the entire campus community has come to rely on computers, the contingency planning process has also underscored the ability of many departments to function — though not easily — without them. For example, Champagne points out that the purchasing department could buy chairs without a computerized order form; Willis notes that the dining service’s menus, currently on computer screens, can be hand printed, and the debit cards for meals temporarily replaced by cash.

Even though the College’s computers will be fully Y2K compliant, the campus could be affected by computer problems beyond its control, come Jan. 1, 2000. Despite the best efforts of the Resolution 2000 Working Group, the smooth operations of the College would be affected if there were computer crashes in banks where faculty paychecks are direct deposited, in HMOs or insurance companies handling their health benefits, or in the pension plans where their retirement funds are invested.

“There are all these tentacles linking the College to the world,” acknowledges Paadre. “We can’t test everybody’s systems.” Hence, the importance of contingency plans.

When the Resolution 2000 Working Group convened in May 1997 they began collecting Y2K compliance statements from manufacturers of the computer, software, alarm and electronic systems used by the College. Paadre took the process a step further by actually testing compliance. In his computer laboratory in the basement of Fenwick Hall, Paadre created a model of the College’s computer system and tested it by pushing the internal clock to Dec. 31, 1999. Just as he expected, the system converted without a hitch. Paadre then took the model on a longer test ride, successfully overcoming the first year 2000 challenge, the leap year date shift from Feb. 29 to March 1, and the rollover on Dec. 31, to 2001. Once again, the system performed without a problem.

“The advantage to this kind of testing is that it puts none of the students, faculty, staff, or their equipment at risk,” Paadre explains.

When the real date switch occurs, however, he’d prefer to be even more cautious.
“To be on the safe side, I’d like to shut down the entire system on Dec. 31,” Paadre says. “Then, on Jan. 1, 2, or 3, I’d like to manually start up each system separately.”

Shutting down the entire campus computer system would not be as drastic as it sounds. New Year’s Eve is on a Friday; because of the Christmas break, the College will be operating with only a skeleton staff. Classes don’t start again until Jan. 17, which gives the Working Group more than two weeks to deal with any potential problems, and if necessary, execute existing contingency plans.

According to McFadden, his primary concern is any major interruption to the fuel oil supply for the campus heating system. “ If this were to occur,” he says, “since the students won’t be on campus at the time, we would respond by reducing our heating to occupied buildings only. This would allow us to maintain service for three-to-four days. If the interruption persisted beyond that time frame, we could switch to natural gas as a back-up fuel since our boilers have dual capacity.”

On a sunny Friday in late spring, potential computer problems at the end of the year seem distant indeed. As students lounge on the grass, chatting about vacation plans, Paadre is gearing up for a busy summer. By the time students return in the fall, he will have completed testing the College’s computer systems for Y2K compliance. Also, during the summer, two outdated computer systems that handle financial records and student services will be replaced with new systems that are Y2K compliant.

Over at the dining services, Willis, too, notes that the summer break will be far from leisurely. “It’s going to be a challenge getting everything in place before classes start again in the fall,” he says. That means dismantling the old system, installing new servers and computer terminals at the points of sale, and getting a new system of stored-value cards into place.

At the same time Paadre is troubleshooting the College’s computer network, Scott is tracking Y2K compliance and potential problems in the 850 or so personal computers used by faculty and staff, as well as those in the common lab areas. Students are responsible for their own PCs, but they can get assistance from the information technology staff. There’s even a special e-mail account to handle Y2K concerns: hcy2k@holycross.edu.

Scott ticks off a list of computer hardware — IBM, Dell, Acer Pentium, and Macintosh — that have been tested and found to be compliant. “ Some older machines are not,” he adds. “The plan is to replace them all with new computers that are compliant.”

Computer software is also being tested; Macintosh and Novell are Y2K compliant, while Windows 95 needs patches. The most popular applications — Excel, for example, are compliant, but it’s possible for users to customize them so that they are not.

“We’ve purchased software to analyze Access database and Excel spreadsheet data for compliance,” Scott says. “Every time a two digit year comes up, it can be problematic. However, the vast majority of computer users store dates as information, and are not using dates for calculation.”

The classic problem with two-digit dates surfaced in the student information system back in 1996 when Paadre discovered a computer-generated letter welcoming the class of 1900.

“The data in the letter was correct, the student names were correct, it was just a matter of changing the line of code so that the year 2000 could be expressed,” he explains.

Nestor, the academic representative on the working group, cites another example. “The workhorses of our chemistry laboratories are the UV visible spectrophotometers, which run with microprocessors on board,” she explains. Spectrophotometers are used to measure concentrations of chemicals by reading their ability to absorb light at ultraviolet or visible wavelengths. Although they display the date along with the data, it’s not something that affects the calculations made by the instruments. “In chemistry, as in other departments, we’ve compiled inventories of equipment and spent a lot of time going to Web sites to find out if it’s Y2K compliant,” Nestor adds.

Pencils and paper, or maybe even solar calculators could be computer substitutes in the contingency plans of the College’s purchasing department. “We could go back to a paper-based system if the computers are down,” acknowledges Joan Champagne, purchasing manager. “We have contracts with most of our major vendors and they would accept a verbal order.”

Champagne has already gotten verification from vendors that they are Y2K compliant. However, most of the buying for the academic year ahead will be done during the summer. “Late December and early January are slow periods for purchasing,” Champagne says, “The volume at that time of year is way down.”

Timing then, is an added benefit to the efforts of the Resolution 2000 Working Group. Considering the volume of work team members will have completed by the end of the year, and barring any unexpected complications, Paadre does not expect to spend New Year’s Eve in the computer laboratory. “I’m very thankful to the team, my staff, and the entire ITS department,” he says. “Everyone has worked together on this problem.”

Scott, a ’67 graduate of Holy Cross, quotes one of his Jesuit professors: “It’s unwise to speak in absolutes,” he says, “but given the time we’ve spent and research we’ve done on potential Y2K problems, I’d be surprised if anything untoward happens.”


Margaret LeRoux is a free-lance journalist from Worcester.  

 

    Back to index of Features >
   College of the Holy Cross   |   1 College Street, Worcester, MA 01610   |   (508) 793 2011   |   Copyright 2004   |      email   |   webmaster@holycross.edu